How to Streamline Your Accreditation Process Without Compromising Quality
Posted by WizeHive on August 07, 2019
Accreditation is meant to be challenging and push organizations to be their best. But if it becomes impossible to attain because of complex procedures, you’ll fall short in your mission to uphold your industry’s standards.
If your applicants are struggling under the weight of your accreditation process, it’s time to take a closer look at your program’s structure. To get you started, we’ve gathered four examples of best practices from leading accreditors that you can adopt to simplify your process.
URAC is a Washington DC-based non-profit organization that helps promote health care quality through the accreditation of medical organizations. They recently announced plans to significantly reduce the amount of information required by applying organizations.
In a press release, they explained the reasoning for the change. "We've listened to feedback from our clients and are striving to meet their call to reduce the administrative burden associated with accreditation without compromising the integrity of our quality process," said Shawn Griffin, M.D., URAC President and CEO. "We're proud to announce that we have reduced the general organization data collection required, in some instances, by as much as 90%."
URAC previously required detailed documentation about an organization’s structure, governance, staff, and business model. However, a closer look at what they were collecting led to the realization that most of the information wasn’t relevant to their decision-making process.
Your Next Step
Make it a priority to examine your accreditation requirements with a critical eye.
The Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (CAA) accredits eligible clinical doctoral programs in audiology and master's degree programs in speech-language pathology.
For the 2019-2020 program year, CAA plans to analyze its communications through a series of audits, interviews, and surveys, examining timeliness, clarity, and appropriateness. They’re also developing resources for what new program directors need to know and when, with regard to CAA’s processes and their accreditation status.
They recognized the importance of getting the right message to the right person at the right time. Doing this well can make the accreditation process move along more seamlessly for everyone.
Your Next Step
Are your processes and instructions clear and easy to understand? A communications audit (perhaps by a third-party) can help you see any blind spots and assumptions. You could also interview program participants to find out where they’re getting stuck or confused. It can be helpful to provide prompts, such as:
The Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) is a globally recognized leader for accrediting educational programs in the dental professions.
In their strategic plan for 2017 - 2021, one of their objectives was to “create technology strategies to improve accreditation program efficiency and effectiveness.” To do this, they implemented a formal technology audit to identify current and future technology needs.
CODA realized that in order to keep pace with the expectations of being a leading accreditor in their industry, they had to ensure a solid technology foundation.
Your Next Step
Whether you’ve been using a combination of homegrown systems or accreditation management software, technology changes fast. it’s important to periodically assess your current system to find efficiencies, reduce redundancies, and improve the applicant experience. As part of your audit, you could:
The American Medical Association (AMA) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) recently simplified and aligned their expectations for the AMA PRA Category 1 Credit. In addition, they produced a shared glossary of terms and definitions for accredited CME providers and learners.
The changes were developed by the Bridge Committee, made up of staff and volunteers from both organizations. The AMA and ACCME recognized a need for proactive communication on the evolution of the two complementary systems in their field.
Your Next Step
Think about whether your organization needs a “bridge” to similar certifications, accreditations, or licensing programs. Here are some questions to consider:
Hopefully, these innovative improvements to accreditation programs have given you some inspiration for streamlining your own processes.
If you’re looking for effective ways to lead the charge for safety, quality, and innovation, making your programs easier to navigate is the first step to achieving your mission.